Whether the coverage gap is due to an inadvertent oversight of a policy expiration date or a calculated decision to “roll the dice,” the results can be devastating.
Recently an insured law firm found out the hard way that letting coverage lapse for just a short period, and then neglecting to secure tail coverage, can result in a serious exposure.
During a busy period, the insured neglected to submit a renewal application before the expiration date. When the firm received notice the policy had expired, it scrambled to secure coverage.
Last-minute renewals and/or policy expiration raise a red flag for insurance underwriters: if this individual is not careful about this deadline, it could indicate he or she may also overlook other important dates (such as court deadlines).
The law firm did secure coverage with a non-standard carrier and then at renewal, changed carriers. The law firm declined to secure optional “tail coverage. “Tail” coverage protects the insured against claims resulting from a time period before the current policy became effective.
Two years after the gap in coverage occurred, the firm was notified of a claim on a case they had handled prior to the coverage gap. Were they protected?
The settlement or judgment has the potential to wipe out both the firm’s assets and the attorney’s personal assets. This new claim will also substantially increase the firm’s cost of securing professional liability coverage for years to come, negatively impacting future income potential.